Story structure
State the protagonist’s goal, the obstacle in their way and the change that resolves the story. Use those three points to decide why each scene is needed.
Turn a story-game idea into a scene plan with a clear protagonist, escalating stakes and an earned ending. Decide where interaction changes the story and where it supports the telling.
This page is a planning guide. Elseland Game Maker is not publicly available yet. You can browse games on the website or play in the mobile app.
Make these decisions before choosing a tool or expanding the project.
State the protagonist’s goal, the obstacle in their way and the change that resolves the story. Use those three points to decide why each scene is needed.
Give each scene a job: reveal a clue, change a relationship, force a decision or show a consequence. Merge scenes that perform the same job without adding a new perspective.
Separate choices that alter later events from choices that express personality. Both can be useful, but the wording should not imply a major branch when none exists.
List the earlier events an ending resolves. A final twist is easier to understand when the player can connect it to evidence or decisions already encountered.
Use the sequence below to keep the first version small enough to inspect.
Sketch an opening, a complication, a turning point, a crisis and a resolution. Identify the one question each beat answers before writing long dialogue.
Build or sketch one scene with a player action that leads to the next. Test whether the player understands the action’s meaning and the new situation.
Trace the events that lead to every planned ending. Remove contradictions and add missing setup. Check the emotional pace as well as the state logic.
An original planning example, not a claim that Elseland has generated this result.
A courier must return a lost letter before the island’s final ferry leaves. Plan five scenes: discovery, an unreliable witness, a choice of routes, a missed meeting and the delivery. One route reveals the sender’s motive; the other preserves time. Design two endings that acknowledge which information the courier actually learned.
A concrete check is more useful than another variation of the same prompt.
Remove a scene temporarily. If neither motivation nor understanding changes, give it a clearer purpose or leave it out.
Track names, locations and known facts. A character must not respond to information the player has not received.
Ask the tester which earlier moment explains the ending. If no moment comes to mind, strengthen the setup rather than adding a longer explanation at the end.
Answers about scope, handoff and the limits of this workflow.
No. A linear story can use exploration, dialogue choices or investigation to involve the player. Branching is useful when the alternative paths add meaningful consequences.
This guide focuses on scene structure, dramatic pacing and endings. An interactive-story workflow focuses more closely on choice nodes, variables and the conditions that connect paths.
You can use it as source material you are entitled to adapt, but a game needs actions and feedback. Choose one scene that gains something from player participation before converting the whole text.
Elseland Game Maker is not publicly available yet. This page helps you prepare a brief and evaluate a workflow. The current website offers games to browse and play; the mobile app is a separate destination.
No. They are written examples and acceptance checks. Producing a working game or asset requires a suitable tool, implementation and testing.
Explore the Elseland homepage and choose a game to play.
Play Games Now